|
|
Countless
wars have been caused by it; it gives rise to hatred and violence; untold
arguments, feuds and crimes stem from it; it is so much a part of some
societies, religions and political systems that it is practically an
institution; it is synonymous with fanaticism and bigotry. Intolerance is one of
the greatest causes of trouble in the world. Because we are basically unsure
about ourselves, we look at others to see what they are doing and how they are
doing it; we then compare ourselves with that, to see if we are ‘better’,
‘worse’, or ‘the same’. If we compare ourselves with people who seem to
be more fortunate and better-off than us, envy might arise: ‘I would like to
be like them; they are so lucky!’ If we compare ourselves with others who are
less well-off, pride might arise: ‘I am better than them’. It does not have
to happen like this, of course; we could feel joy for others who are better-off
than us, instead of envy; we could feel sympathy rather than pride towards those
who are less well-off; we could, but seldom do. We could learn to compare better than we are used to, so that prejudice might decrease and wisdom increase. You see, it usually happens when we compare ourselves with others that we allow our emotions to interfere and distort things; selfish desire and fear come in; bias and prejudice take over. We should be honest about our feelings; it’s quite alright to dislike things (nobody likes everything or everyone); but we should be sufficiently mature and in control that we do not always allow our likes and dislikes to rule our lives. We should be able to examine the rationale behind our feelings, and be willing to put our preferences behind us at times, because we cannot always have what we want or like, and it wouldn’t be good if we could. How spoiled and arrogant we would become if we could always gratify ourselves! Our understanding of self and others is inaccurate; we begin with an unclear self-view that comes from comparison: I am handsome/ugly; he is ugly/handsome. I am smart/dumb; she is dumb/smart. I am good/they are bad, and so on. By what standards do we judge? Are they natural standards, valid in all times and places? Or are they just relative concepts that change? Can we establish, once and for all, in a manner that would be acceptable to everyone, what is good, bad, handsome, ugly, right, wrong, smart, dumb, etc.? Do we not all have elements of good and bad in us? If we want to, we can see good in bad and bad in good, right in wrong and wrong in right, regardless of whether or not they are there. And even the most externally ugly person may have some beauty inside him, the most intelligent person some flaw. A poor man may be rich in spirit, and a rich man poor; there are many ways to be rich and poor, and not just in terms of money. Who is so perfect that he dares think of himself as the model or ideal for others? This is how intolerance arises. In their ignorance and conceit, some people think of themselves as so good, so right, that no-one else can possibly be as good or right, and should therefore become like photocopies of them. We like others to accept our standards, and some of us try to impose them on others; Christian missionaries are notorious for this in their zeal to convert others, while knowing little or nothing—or even misunderstanding—about their ways. If we would realize and accept the fact that nature knows nothing of equality or uniformity but produces things in variety, maybe intolerance would not arise; we would feel more secure about ourselves and would more readily accept people as they are—different, unique and special—and not expect or want them to conform to our standards. It is because we are insecure in ourselves that we feel threatened by the differences of others and want them to be like us, so that we won’t be alone, the thought of which terrifies us. Funny, though, because in another way, we also want to be different, and would hate to live in a society like Mao’s China, where everyone dressed alike! What we really want in our confusion, we do not know. Some years ago, I overheard some young people making fun of someone who was rather effeminate and calling him ‘queer’. “Hold on a minute”, I said, “before you go making fun of others in this way, you need to be sure of a few things. First, you should know that very few people want to be as they are; are you content with the way you are? Is there nothing you would change about yourself if you could? We are as we are because of circumstances and conditions, not by choice. Secondly, can you be sure that if and when you marry and have children, none of them will turn out to be like the people you make fun of now?” It caused them to think somewhat, and one of them vowed never again to make fun of others who were different from him. If only it were often so easy to explain things to others and be understood!
Right now, we may be ‘alright’, but because everything
changes and nothing remains the same, it might happen that we become ‘not
alright’, and how would we feel then? From what I can gather, getting married
is usually a happy thing (at the time of the event and shortly after, at least,
but several people, speaking with hind-sight, have informed me how lucky I am to
be unmarried and advised me to remain so! I wasn’t sure if they were joking or
serious); it is also a tremendous gamble, and many people lose. If and when they
have children there is absolutely no way to know how they will turn out; they
cannot be ordered to specification. No-one can prove or disprove
reincarnation, but the wide-spread belief in it indicates we should suspend
judgment and say ‘maybe, maybe not’ rather than ‘pooh-poohing’ the idea.
People who claim to be able to see the continuum of past lives through to the
present—mediums, clairvoyants, psychics or seers—say that arrogance,
derision, scornful laughter and so on produce terrible consequences later on
because of the pain caused to others thereby. How far this is true I cannot say,
as I am not one of such people. But I can see that terrible things do happen in
the world, and feel that it is better to restrain ourselves now than to ‘eat
humble pie’ later if the kind of thing that we have condemned or made fun of
in others happens to us or someone near and dear to us; there, but for fortune,
go you and I. Life seems to have methods for correcting our shortcomings, but
they are seldom painless; wouldn’t it be better if we tried to correct them
ourselves, and avoid the necessity of life doing it painfully? The world awaits us.
|
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE THE WEBSITE, PLEASE CLICK HERE
|